Israeli's revenge .....

The world is not fair to Israel, so says its Defence Minister Ehud Barak. Remember, some time ago, Iran acquired a few thousands mid range or long range missiles, either from Russia or by making them, for the purpose of defending itself from Israeli jet fighters. Israeli's Benjamin Netanyahu was whining to the neocons in the White House, that it might be difficult or even impossible to attack if Israeli's F-16s and F-35s were being shot at as they approached the Iraq-Iranian border. US should do something about it.

It's not fair that these Iranians have the means to counter attack Israel's planes, even in the name of defending themselves. The Iranians should be like the Egyptians or the Iraqis or the Syrians of yesteryears to expose their tanks and facilities so that we, Israelis, can destroy them for clearly they were acquired or built to destroy God's chosen people. It is Israel's right to kill as many Arabs as possible and it was the duty of US and Britain to ensure that we succeeded.

Remember, some 80 years ago, that bastard Hitler tried to kill us Jews and nearly succeeded. But we swore never again are we to be destroyed. We are now taking vengeance against those Germans by killing Arabs that are now set to destroy us. We dare not hit back at Germany and the Germans because they may prove to be strong. However, the Arabs, especially those of the Palestinian variety, are easy meat. So says Netanyahu who is pleading for Obama to pull his finger out and do something to save Israel.

Hiding their weapons complex deep underground, the Iranians are a bad sport since Israeli's bombs cannot reach them. The Iranians should lie bare their industrial complexes, their military bases and other strategic facilities for US satellites to photograph them and to provide intelligence for Israel to destroy them. Because it is Israel's right to ensure that those Ayrabs and Persians should not live like human beings. So says Netanyahu and such ...

Update 29/02/2012 Wednesday:

The latest is that both Netanyahu and Ehud Barak are not going to rely on Barack Obama to help them destroy Iran's capability to make nuclear weapons. They seem to say that "hey, you blackie, what do you know about Western, and especially Israel, civilization that is now facing a clear and present danger from Ahmadninejad. If you guys in the White House are lackadaisical about Iran, then, we are compelled to go on our own without telling you about it until it's all over on the frontpages. Remember, with a couple of nuclear devices, Iran is capable of wiping Israel off the map. We have to defend ourselves by deploying the hundreds of nuclear bombs to use against those Iranians."

Update 02/03/2012 Friday: A recent article by Erik S Margolis that appears in the Sun today reveals the sad truth of Iran's military power. I believe in what the writer says about Iran's military weaknesses. In spite of what we read and see in the media, those thousands of missiles, mid range and short range types, are, most probably, not accurate enough to exact damages on sophisticated jet fighters, like the F-16s and F-35s, from Israel or the US. As for the Iran's jet fighters they are mostly outdated F-14s, operating at below par for want of proper spare parts, acquired during the Shah's regime. There are Russian MIGs sent by Saddam Hussain when his air force was nearly obliterated during the 2nd Iraq-US war and some other refurbished Russian jet fighters.

The Israelis and the Americans know about this. Iran's strengths are in its Revolutionary Guards and the suicide speedboats; but they cannot in all honesty withstand the havoc inflicted by modern fighters. That's why there is increasing hype from Ehud Barack and Netanyahu to go it alone to attack Iran for they know that they can win in any areal warfare against Iran.

Update 04/03/2012 Sunday: Short of threatening the President of United States, warmonger Netanyahu of Israel is insisting that Obama should take the initiative to attack Iran before Iran starts producing nuclear bombs. The sooner, the better. Obama seems to be pissed off with Israel's paranoia that Israel is under attack and seems to say that "Hey, you Yid, when it's time to do something, we'll really do something about it. US is taking all sort of actions to make Iran come to terms with us, but we will not be aggravated by a bunch of the likes of Ehud Barak and Netanyahu".

In the past week, Ehud Barak has been canvassing in the Capitol to drum up supports of the Senators from both Democrats and Republicans on Israel's stand to take unilateral action against Iran. Netanyahu has even the cheek to tell Obama to get Iran to dismantle its underground nuclear facilities because Israel's jet fighters cannot get to them. The Yid conveniently forgets his own 300 nuclear bombs when talking to Obama.

As I said before, Netanyahu complains of Iran's total unsporting behaviour for not exposing Iran's facilities as targets for his aircrafts.

Update 06/03/2012 Teusday: In an effort to convince the US administration to take tough action on Iran, Netanyahu re-invokes the Holocaust story again and again, this time producing a letter from the World Jewish Congress asking, in 1944, the US war department to bomb Auschwitz. The polite refusal from the US war department (saying, in effect, they had more important things to do than diverting away from their strategic objectives) to the Zionist request, according to Netanyahu, was similar to what's now happening in the Obama administration. Netanyahu is equating what happened to the Jews then to what Iran is threatening to start another holocaust in Israel. He is equating the Germans at the heights of their power to an impoverished Iranians with less military hardware than Zimbabwe.

"Don't you guys in the White House realise that Israel is under threats ? Our very survival is at stake !"

Update 08/03/2012 Thursday: Netanyahu went back to Israel disappointed that Obama was not really keen to attack Iran immediately. Obama's rationale was that there was insufficient proof that Iran was on the verge of producing a nuclear bomb while this Israeli nut insisted that his country was in extreme danger from Iran. Obama would not fall for the "nuclear bomb trick" as George Bush did which prompted him to attack Iraq without just cause. Obama, rightly, does not want to go down in history as the US President responsible for World War III.

Update 11/03/2012 Sunday: Newt Gingrich is desperate for Zionist support because he thinks that demonising Iran is one sure way of getting zionist fundings from all over America for him to win the Republican presidential nominee. Watching him debate on Youtube is enough for me to conclude that he has absolutely no idea on world affairs. He claims Ahmad Dinejad is a tyrant to his people, without knowing the meaning of the word.

As I said before ....

You can get away with murder here. So I said before. You also can get away with drug smuggling provided the quantity of the drugs is a lot. If you are caught with, say a few grams above the mandatory limit, you can bet your life you be will sentenced to be hanged until you are dead - like a man was sentenced to death for having some 60 grams of methamphetamine, somewhere written down here. However, if you are caught with kilos and kilos of dangerous drugs, you can bet your money that you will get away scot free. That seems to be the way the judiciary operates these days.

In a Sun report in a high court in George Town in Penang, a 36 year old Iranian woman by the name of Leila Fatami, accused of carrying 1.75 kilo and Sahar Mohammedi of carrying 2.16 kilo, of methamphetamine, were acquitted by the trial judge. The judge's rationale for his acquittal verdict was because the prosecution witnesses contradicted among themselves. The judge, apparently, ignored the fact that the drugs were found in the accused respective suitcases.

Therefore if you want to get away with murder or drug smuggling in this country, all you need do is to ensure that the prosecution (which is usually the Police) produced unreliable witnesses and, Voila ! you get away with whatever crimes you committed.

The two Iranians came to this country as tourists in February of 2011.

A princess tale ...

Once upon a time there lived a Danish princess. One day, she was invited to a state banquet in honour of the visit of the President of a neighbouring country called Finland. Seated to her left was the husband of the President. The husband was well known throughout Finland for his philandering ways during his young, carefree bachelor days and for his leering ways when he grew into late, very late middle age.

The princess was also into her late, but not so late middle age, and is suffering from, what American men would say, a seven-year itch syndrome, female version. So, on that occasion, she was dressed to kill, and was wearing a low-slung, dark V-shaped dressed, with gold embroidery borders on the V. Being a princess, she was, of course, wearing a tiara.

Unbeknownst to her, the person sitting next to her was leering at her neckline with such intensity that he forgot that he was being watched by the ubiquitous paparazzi video camera. However, female intuition warned her that her cleavage was being scrutinously inspected by the leering eyes of the man next to her. The man was wondering " was she, or was she not" wearing a bra. With savoire faire, she turned her head to face the lascivious man who reacted by looking up at the ceiling with a small smirk in his face, reminding me of what kids do when, from behind, they tap their friends head and look the other away, in all innocence, when confronted.

The incident infuriated the Danish press and could precipitate a diplomatic war, if not a full declaration of war, between Finland and Denmark. The Danish press was offended at the indignity that the country's royal tits of Princess Mary were being voyeuristically defiled by commoner Arajarvi's eyes from Finland.

[The tale is by courtesy of the Daily Telegraph of Britain - my version].

Sorry, no visas for you ..

It's good to know that finally the Malaysian government is taking a tough stand on the so called foreign students from Africa and the Middle East. Concerned that these students are involved in drug smuggling and other scams, the authorities impose stricter conditions to the granting of visas to these students. Those who are not bona fide students i.e. students that just register for temporary enrolment in private colleges would have their visa applications turned down. Granting of visas will be subject to the colleges acceptance, course tenures, and many other restrictive terms and conditions.

For years, these students, some as old as over 30, come to this country to earn their first degrees ? Instead, they prey on the locals by perpetrating internet scams, and be involved in drug smuggling in the kilos and kilos.

Female students or tourists from China, Phillipines, Thailand come here for a different reason - to earn money in prostitution - while Africans and Iranians come here to commit crimes like drug smuggling and cheating. It's about time that Malaysia doesn't give a chance to these bastardos who are out to ruin the country.

So can we .....

What is this William Hague, the bald-headed Foreign Secretary of Britain, talking about fears of a new "Cold War" in the world and in the Middle-East should Iran successfully acquire nuclear weapons. First of all, what is Iran compared to Russia, Europe and US. After World War II, the big powers were (and still are) US and Russia (never mind that it was actually the Soviet Union). Both had armies and conventional weapons in equitable numbers and, worse, both had weapons of mass destruction. Both feared that one may attack the other if given the opportunity. A war between the 2 would result in mutual annihilation. There was then a very serious Cold War lasting for nearly six decades.

But now we have a small fart of a nation trying to impress the world that what the West (meaning US and Europe) can do, she can also do. If the West can industrialise, so can the Iranians. If the West can develop weapons, for mass destruction or not, so can Iran develop its own weapons. What's wrong with that !

And now we witness this Hague fellow telling us that Iran poses serious threats not only to the Middle East but also to the world. He thinks that once Iran manages to develop nuclear bomb technology, other countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Algeria, Turkey - even little Jordan and Abu Dhabi - and all the other "stan" countries to the north and east of Iran shiver on their camels to counter Iran by making weapons of their own, resulting in nuclear weapons proliferation.

For all we know, Iran is merely developing nuclear weapons to tell those zionist Yids in Tel Aviv that "Look here, if you try to nuke us, we can also nuke you. And, if your nukes could kill 20 millions of us, we could obliterate the few millions in Tel Aviv, Haifa, and Jaffa. You won't have anybody left".

It reminds me of the US propaganda during the Vietnam War years. Some idiot in the White House or the Pentagon implanted the idea of the domino theory - that if South Vietnam falls, so would all countries in South East Asia, falling like dominoes. The idiot got the idea when observing his children arranging dominoes in a row and by toppling the first domino against the second and the third and so on, all the other dominoes started falling, well, like dominoes. He promoted this idea about Vietnam in the White House and the Pentagon, and all the people there believe in the Domino Theory. In reality, what happened was that Vietnam became an independent nation and is now a member of South East Asian grouping called Asean. Even the US is helping Vietnam to develop itself.

Before this Hague fellow start influencing his nation on threats from Iran, doesn't he know that North Korea has already developed nuclear devices and the means of delivery. Is there a nuclear arms proliferation in the region ? Doesn't he know that as soon as India started exploding nuclear bombs, its biggest enemy Pakistan started developing and detonating their own nuclear bombs ? But then, is their any nuclear arms proliferation in the region ?

Again, as I said, what is this bald headed minister talking about a new Cold War in the Middle east !

In reality, the West belligerant attitude towards Iran must be something to do with that precious commodity called oil. The British in particular feels that the oil deposit in Iran still belongs to them. Fighting North Korea, India or Pakistan is meaningless since these countries have nothing useful. Their poverty stricken population becomes a liability. But taking over Iran, Iraq, Libya is profitable and means a lot to the West's growth.